Should we give money to homeless on streetcorners?
2 December 2023
In the heart of Athens, a gathering of philosophical minds convened at the ancient Agora, echoing the spirited dialogues of Socrates. The question that sparked their intellectual fire was whether we should give money to the homeless on street corners.
Socrates, with his characteristic curiosity, initiated the discourse: “Does it matter, my fellow thinkers, whether we extend a hand to those in need? Let us delve into the essence of our actions.”
One member, known for his practical wisdom, pondered the complexities of dealing with homeless people. “It’s not merely about money,” he argued. “It’s about addressing the root causes, offering empathy, and creating sustainable solutions.”
A ripple of anticipation spread through the assembly as Bill Wayborn, a respected reporter, took the floor. “I lived as a homeless man for a year,” he shared, his voice echoing with experience. “Understanding their struggles is crucial; it transcends the material to the human connection we must foster.”
The conversation turned towards moral obligations. “Don’t we have a moral duty to alleviate suffering?” questioned a philosopher, emphasizing the ethical imperative embedded in our actions.
Socrates, ever the provocateur, challenged the assembly: “Do we suppose judgment when we encounter those less fortunate? Is our generosity tainted by the societal gaze?”
A passionate advocate for innovative solutions brought up examples like the restaurant Taste, where patrons pay what they can for healthy meals. “Projects like these redefine charity, focusing on dignity and empowerment,” he asserted.
Discussions expanded to the role of organizations dedicated to meeting the multifaceted needs of homelessness. The assembly considered Finland’s approach, where providing homes for everyone was presented as a model to emulate.
Intriguingly, the mention of Smeadly Bulter and the “$20 question” stirred curiosity, prompting members to commit to further research on the interconnectedness of generosity and impact.
The Center for Transforming Lives was explored, with considerations of mental health and morality intertwining in the discourse. Child homelessness surfaced as a poignant concern, prompting a call for comprehensive solutions.
Utah’s bold experiment with Housing First and its impact on the state fueled contemplation on scalable strategies. However, skepticism emerged as the assembly scrutinized the charitable landscape, noting that not all organizations were equal. Goodwill’s for-profit status and alleged shortcomings were juxtaposed with alternatives like Berry Good Buy and First Street Mission.
The final deliberation centered on federal programs, particularly the WPA, as potential alternatives for addressing homelessness. Socrates, invoking the wisdom of the ancients, urged his disciples to weigh the efficacy of such grand endeavors.
As the philosophical symposium concluded, the question lingered in the air, leaving each member with a thoughtful ember to carry into the world, where the pursuit of justice and compassion awaited.
Contributor: Poet Icarus